Return-Path: [Canadian Consulate General contact's email]
Received: from mailgw1.international.gc.ca ([198.103.104.179])
by mx-emperor.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1gVlkQ1fX3Nl34l0
for [SC's primary e-address]; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:15:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lbpdmexh05.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ([10.4.32.53]) by mailgw1.international.gc.ca with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:15:09 -0500
Received: from denvrdmres01.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ([10.37.2.31]) by lbpdmexh05.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:15:08 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE:
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:15:07 -0700
Message-ID: <8B77C0E097250E49B9EC68A0577FAC3B83B16C@denvrdmres01.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <23551587.1166109069425.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Index: Accfkh0gJkrQLRA2QLaVqal2NwNsoAAN5dVg
From: [Canadian Consulate General contact's email]
To: [SC's primary e-address]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2006 22:15:08.0928 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B4E9800:01C72096]
X-ELNK-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=1; sbrc=-0; sbf=cb; sbw=000;



From: [Canadian Consulate General contact's email] [Add to Address Book]
[This is spam]
To: [SC's primary e-address]
Subject: RE:
Date: Dec 15, 2006 5:15 PM
Hi Sahar,

I just wanted to let you know that I spoke to the Physician Access Center at UCH
this afternoon. They were unable to make a determination regarding the status
of your situation other than to advise when you were treated on an out-patient basis.
They referred me to their Patient Representative, who was not in today, for further
information. I left her a voice mail and will hopefully be able to speak with her
on Monday.

Have a nice weekend.

With kind regards,


[Canadian Consulate General contact]
Consular Officer / Agent des affaires consulaires
Canadian Consulate General / Consulat g??al du Canada
Suite 2600 - 1625 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80202
Tel. [direct phone]
Fax. [direct fax]
* Email: [Canadian Consulate General contact's email]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sahar Chinyere [mailto:SC's primary e-address]
Sent: December 14, 2006 8:11 AM
To: [Canadian Consulate General contact] -DENVR -CS
Subject: Fw:

Dear [Canadian Consulate General contact]:

Forwarded is an example of a document (referral) that was removed by UCH from my
record. They had been withholding my radioactive iodine (that was supposed to be
intended to kill the thyroid) and telling me not to take anti-thyroid tablets for
months prior to the 3/2005 dose, that I ultimately received by insisting that they
could consult my Canadian ophthalmologist by phone (12 units of radioactive iodine
that I think they called millicures) while I was dangerously hyperthyroid because
supposedly I was to be seen by UCH Ophthalmology any day at which point I would
immediately be sent to Nuclear Medicine.

To date, the urgent referrals to Ophthalmology have never been honored and during
the one show of a Neurology consult that I received from UCH, there was no attempt
to determine anything but my home-equity situation of which I had not informed the
Neuro Resident who wrote me as having 20-20 vision when I have had nothing close
since childhood. I am either legally blind or on the border of legal blindness
in one eye and not doing well in the other eye especially now that there are a lot
of autoimmune [*Clarification: non-contagious thyroid-related] responses flared & so forth.

Further, the Neuro Resident wrote her Clinic Notes in a Thank You for the Referral
format addressed to Dr. Gutierrez-Hartmann despite his not having been informed
of the consult by me and his not having been the referrer. The referrer was neurosurgeon
Dr. Glen(n) Kindt. As of 11/27/2006, UCH Endocrinology (Jen W., Scheduling, 9:30
- 9:35 a.m. phone call) stated that she was informed to tell me, "You specifically
have been discharged forever." During a previous week she had informed me
that over 90% of CICP referrrals & re-referrals to Endocrinology are approved.

I was suspicious of [thyroid-related condition] by 12/2004 [*Corrected typo (i.e. not 2006 but two years ago: 2004)] and lied to about
its possibility in my case. Then at the time of discharge by Dr. Sbarboro, as of
12/9/2005, I was in the process of being transferred to the neuroendocrinologist,
Dr. Woodmansee, whom I have never been allowed to see. Now, as of 12/6/2006 I have
been formally diagnosed with this rare and life-threatening [thyroid-related] disorder
that is acutely flared and am still being denied the healthcare that I need for
stabilization and to which I am entitled through UCH, the assigned provider to patients
in my county (Arapahoe) by the CICP (Colorado Indigent Care Program).

I realize that people in the CICP program have a more difficult time getting their
referrals approved, although that also is illegal & against the posted Department
of Health & Human Services regulations. However it has been made clear that
I have been particularly prevented from healthcare at UCH by Dr. Sbarboro given
not only his relationship to participants in the mortgage & foreclosure fraud
action in which I am testifying but statistics & quotes that I have received
along with timing issues. Most recently, since Dr. Sbarboro learned of my deteriorated
condition, the defendants suddenly decided that they want unilateral discovery of
me whereas previously they wanted & were granted zero discovery for both parties.

Thank you for your kind understanding and urgent help,

SC.


----- Original Message -----
From: Sahar Chinyere
To: nazam@aao.org ; ethics@aao.org
Cc: [Parishioners' Advocates]; Woodward, Paula
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ethics@aao.org


Dear Dr. Burke:

Thank you for letting me know relatively soon that AAO will not check into this
matter after all. Just for the record, the original request for consultation with
the opthalmology department *was* based upon a referral from my endocrinologist
- which is attached.

Sahar Chinyere.

-----Original Message-----
From: Neeshah Azam
Sent: Apr 28, 2005 1:05 PM
To: [SC's primary e-address]
Subject: Ethics@aao.org

Ms. Chinyere,
The Academy's legal counsel and Ethics Committee Vice-Chair have reviewed your
many e-mail messages and have determined that this matter does not specifically
relate to the Rules of the Academy's Code of Ethics; thus it is outside the
purview of the Academy to investigate.

Through these e-mail messages it appears that the specialists in the endocrinology
clinic have communicated with the specialists in the ophthalmology department since
your e-mail correspondence began, but that the original request for consultation
with the ophthalmology department was not based upon a referral from your endocrinologist.
If your endocrinologist finds that an ophthalmic consultation is appropriate, then
he or she is best suited to make that referral.

Thank you.
Mara Pearse Burke
The Academy's Ethics Committee


----- Original Message -----
From: Mara Pearse Burke
To: Sahar Chinyere
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: legal health concern


Thank you for your correspondence. The American Academy of Ophthalmology is looking
into this matter although an initial review of your correspondence clearly indicates
that this may be a legal matter or a matter to be resolved with your insurance company.
If it truly is in the legal arena, then the Academy will likely not be able to address
the matter.

Please let us assess the situation. We will be in touch with you as soon as possible.

Thank you,
Mara Pearse Burke
Ethics Program Manager
American Academy of Ophthalmology
The Eye M.D. Association
http://www.aao.org

----- Original Message -----
From: [Dr. Arthur Gutierrez-Hartmann's email]
To: [SC's primary e-address]
Cc: [Dr. Arthur Gutierrez-Hartmann's Assistant's e-address]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: http://thyroid.about.com...


Dear Ms. Chinyere,

Although I am happy to discuss your case with [SC's Canadian ophthalmologist], I would prefer to also
wait for the opinion of our own ophthalmologist regarding the use of steroids. I
am glad that you have decided to undergo treatment with radioactive iodine. We will
discuss this in more detail at your next visit. In the meantime, your recent thyroid
tests show that you are taking a bit too much methimazol/taapazol. I would suggest
reducing your dose from 25 mg a day to 20 mg a day, ie one 10 mg tab in the am and
one 10 mg tab in the pm. Finally, you have Graves HYPERthyroidism, not Hashimoto's
HYPOthyroidism. I just wanted to make that clear.

Sincerely,
Dr. Gutierrez-Hartmann



Printable View | View All Headers | View Email Source Flag Message



--------------------1/4/2007 NOTE: Dr. Gutierrez-Hartmann input a false age for me and later also falsely told me, "We never thought you had Graves' Eye Disease or any Thyroid Eye Disease". He must not have realized that I had already obtained a copy of this referral, etc. Further, much like there is supposedly another "Scott Anderson" as the applicable County Clerk & Recorder's Office alleges with regard to the fraudulent Power of Attorney filed on the Andersons' property record, there is supposedly 'some other Sahar Alleyne' according to University of Colorado Hospital:

----- Original Message -----
From: Sahar Chinyere
To: Woodward, Paula ; Scott, Carisa D
Cc: Loretta.Todaro@uch.edu ; Mara Pearse Burke
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: possible name confusion

Please note that there appears to be another Sahar Alleyne in the UCH system, whom
I do not know, who was born in 11/1986.

Thank you,
Sahar *Chinyere* (Alleyne).